★★★☆

文章講解：

①Only since the late 1960s have literary scholars attempted to establish an accurate and systematic literary history of women novelists. ②Many previous histories suffered from “Great Traditionalism,” an approach that, by limiting itself to a group of women writers termed “great,” ignored the diversity among women novelists. ③These histories excluded the minor novelists, who are the links in the chain that binds literary generations together, and who allow us to see the continuities in women’s writing. ④Given the distortions produced by this concentration on “great” writers, as well as the obviously problematic tendency of many literary scholars to apply stereotypes of femininity, it was not surprising that?some literary scholars in the early 1960s?evaded the important issue of women’s sexual identity entirely, focusing instead on the form and style of women’s writing. ⑤Such an approach, while insightful and very valuable, did not consider the crucial connection between women’s writing and changes in their legal and economic status.

?

①觀點

↓

②觀點

↓

③事實

↓

④觀點

↓

⑤觀點

題型解析：

1. According to the passage, some literary scholars in the early 1960s tended to do which of the following in their considerations of women novelists’ works??直接細節(jié)☆

C

A. Attack the traditional?distinction?between “great” women novelists and those women novelists considered less important 沒有證據(jù)

B.?Consider?sexual identity when evaluating the works of “great” women novelists but not the works of minor women novelists 相反

C. ignore the issue of the sexual identity of women novelists altogether?

D. Address issues of form and style?more frequently?when discussing “great” women novelists than when discussing minor womennovelists?沒有證據(jù)

E. Apply?more stringent?stylistic standards when evaluating minor women writers than when evaluating the group of women writers?沒有證據(jù)

?

2. Information in the passage suggests that literary histories that adhere to “Great Traditionalism” have which of the following flaws? 間接細節(jié)，③句的反向?qū)Ρ韧评?/p>

C

A. They overemphasize the issue of?sexual identity?in women’s writing?相反

B. They overemphasize the degree of continuity between literary generations?相反

C. They do not help to explain the connection between different generations of women novelists?

D. They denigrate?the achievements of “great” female novelists in comparison with those of male novelists.?沒有證據(jù)

E. They do not incorporate the insights of literary histories produced before the late 1960s.?相反

denigrate?/'d?n?ɡret/毀譽，貶損

3. The attitude of the author of the passage toward the approach taken toward women novelists by “some literary scholars in the early 1960s” can best be described as 作者態(tài)度

C

A. disinterested and aloof 冷淡、冷漠的

B. condescending and dismissive?居高臨下和輕視的

C. respectful but critical?對應最后一句

D. favorable but brusque?喜愛但是唐突無禮的

E. interested but puzzled

文章信息矩陣：